NO EVIDENCE DNC SERVER SOFTWARE THAT THE

вЂ¦ We didnвЂ™t have a sensor in place that saw data leave. ThereвЂ™s circumstantial evidence but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated.вЂќв™¦ There is circumstantial evidence that that data was exfiltrated off the network. But in this case it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just donвЂ™t have the evidence that says it actually left.вЂќв™¦ вЂњThereвЂ™s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated. Asked for the date when alleged Russian hackers stole data from the DNC server, Henry testified that CrowdStrike did not in fact know if such a theft occurred at all: вЂњWe did not have concrete evidence that the data was exfiltrated from the DNC, but we have indicators that it was exfiltrated,вЂќ Henry said.Henry reiterated his claim on multiple occasions:в™¦ вЂњThere are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. The CrowdStrike admissions were released just two months after the Justice Department retreated from its its other central claim that Russia meddled in the 2016 election when it dropped charges against Russian troll farms it said had been trying to get Trump elected.Henry personally led the remediation and forensics analysis of the DNC server after being warned of a breach in late April 2016 his work was paid for by the DNC, which refused to turn over its server to the FBI. Intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia probe, acknowledged to Congress more than two years ago that it had no concrete evidence that Russian hackers stole emails from the Democratic National CommitteeвЂ™s server.CrowdStrike President Shawn HenryвЂ™s admission under oath, in a recently declassified December 2017 interview before the House Intelligence Committee, raises new questions about whether Special Counsel Robert Mueller, intelligence officials and Democrats misled the public.The allegation that Russia stole Democratic Party emails from Hillary Clinton, John Podesta and others and then passed them to WikiLeaks helped trigger the FBIвЂ™s probe into now debunked claims of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia to steal the 2016 election.

The CrowdStrike president speculated that Russian agents might have taken вЂњscreenshotsвЂќ in real time. Chris Stewart of Utah, Henry offered an explanation of how Russian agents could have obtained the emails without any digital trace of them leaving the server. That was the conclusion that we made.вЂќв™¦ вЂњSir, I was just trying to be factually accurate, that we didnвЂ™t see the data leave, but we believe it left, based on what we saw.вЂќв™¦ Asked directly if he could вЂњunequivocally sayвЂќ whether вЂњit was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC,вЂќ Henry told the committee: вЂњI canвЂ™t say based on that.вЂќIn a later exchange with Republican Rep.

TheВ FBI allowed theВ DNCВ to refuse its request to examine the servers. You could take screenshots.вЂќHenryвЂ™s 2017 testimony that there was no вЂњconcrete evidenceвЂќ that the emails were stolen electronically suggests that Mueller was at best misleading in his 2019 final report, in which he stated that Russian intelligence вЂњappears to have compressed and exfiltrated over 70 gigabytes of data from the file server.вЂќIt is unlikely that Mueller had another source to make his more confident claim about Russian hacking. вЂ¦ There would be ways to copy it. вЂњAnd there might not be evidence of it being exfiltrated, but they would have knowledge of what was in the email.

No Evidence Dnc Server Software That The

Before joining CrowdStrike, Henry served as executive assistant director at the FBI under Mueller. вЂ¦ We said that we had a high degree of confidence it was the Russian Government.вЂќBut CrowdStrike was forced to retract a similar accusation months after it accused Russia in December 2016В ofВ hacking the Ukrainian military, with the same software that the firm had claimed to identify inside the DNC server.The firmвЂ™s work with the DNC and FBI is also colored by partisan affiliations. HenryвЂ™s explanation for his firmвЂ™s attribution of the DNC hack to Russia is replete with inferences and assumptions that lead to вЂњbeliefs,вЂќ not unequivocal conclusions.вЂњThere are other nation-states that collect this type of intelligence for sure,вЂќ Henry said, вЂњbut what we would call the tactics and techniques were consistent with what weвЂ™d seen associated with the Russian state.вЂќ In its investigation, Henry said, CrowdStrike вЂњsaw activity that we believed was consistent with activity weвЂ™d seen previously and had associated with the Russian Government.

What it does make clear is that Obama administration officials, the DNC and others have misled the public by presenting as fact information that they knew that was uncertain.The fact that the Democratic Party employed the two private firms that generated the core allegations at the heart of Russiagate вЂ” Russian email hacking and Trump-Russia collusion вЂ“ suggests that the federal investigation was compromised from the start.The 2017 Henry transcript was one of dozens just released after a lengthy dispute. Sussmann played a critical role in generating the Trump-Russia collusion allegation.Ex-British spy and dossier compiler Christopher Steele has testified in British courtВ that Sussmann shared with him the now-debunked Alfa Bank server theory, alleging a clandestine communication channel between the bank and the Trump Organization.HenryвЂ™s recently released testimony does not mean that Russia did not hack the DNC.